Recent US-led bombardment in the South American nation and the detention of its president have renewed apprehension regarding America's designs on the Arctic territory. Members of the former president's political movement have reportedly turned their attention to the resource-rich landmass in the wake of the events in South America.
Only a short time after the start of the Caracas campaign, a prominent conservative commentator, who is married to a high-ranking White House adviser, posted a suggestive map. The graphic showed Greenland covered in the American flag, with the single-word caption: "SOON."
This overt threat to absorb the resource-abundant region, which is a member of the NATO alliance, triggered swift and firm criticism from Denmark's officials.
"Denmark and the US are close allies and should continue to cooperate as such. US security is also Greenland’s and Denmark’s security," stated the Danish ambassador to the United States. "Our nation and the US work together to ensure security in the Arctic."
The diplomat additionally highlighted that the kingdom had significantly increased its military budget recently, earmarking a large amount specifically for Northern and regional defence. "And yes, we expect complete recognition for the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark," he added.
The tensions were additionally complicated by the recent naming of a Southern governor as a representative to Greenland. The governor had openly expressed gratitude to the commander-in-chief, stating it was an "privilege" to serve in a volunteer role to "bring Greenland into the US."
Following the military action in Venezuela, this representative commended the president's actions, connecting it to the wider "war on drugs."
Ever since returning to office, the American leader has consistently alarmed European partners with his expressed desire in Greenland. The island is considered vitally strategic for national security and potential mineral exploitation. It already houses the northernmost US military base.
In a notable media appearance, the president declined to rule out the use of armed action to gain control of Greenland. This stance comes during intensifying great-power competition in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he remarked.
He characterized Greenland as having a "very small amount of people, which we’ll look after, and we’ll cherish them... But we need that for global security."
In reaction to this persistent "drumbeat" of intent, Denmark's intelligence service took the unprecedented step last month of labelling the United States as a "security risk."
The leaders of both Greenland issued a unified and stern statement: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You must not take over other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland reveals a complex sentiment. While a overwhelming percentage of the territory's inhabitants seek independence from Copenhagen, there is also little to no appetite to become part of the United States. The territory has had the option to declare sovereignty for many years.
Military experts are now reconsidering the possibility of such a move. One policy analyst specializing in defence conceded she had once discounted the sabre-rattling but was "now not so sure."
"It wouldn't be that hard for the US to station a few hundred or a few thousand soldiers on Greenland, and it's not clear to me which power could intervene about it," she observed.
Elara Vance is a visual culture critic and curator with a passion for exploring how art intersects with modern society.